Mapping Bayport Alameda

Since Bayport in Alameda is a very new development, I wondered how good the mapping services online where at getting updated. I chose three that offer maps and satellite photos: Yahoo Maps (beta), Google Maps and Microsoft’s Live.

All three have the same mapping results in terms of the number of roads within the new development that they know, although Google shows more of them on the hybrid view (both Yahoo and Live can zoom further in when the hybrid mode is disabled, and then they too show the names of the smaller roads).

Google and Live seem to have identical photos for the area. Both show the site before any work had begun on building the houses (probably 3 years ago at least). Yahoo however is a clear winner here since it has photos showing completed houses in the south east corner of the development. The models and the early phases are clearly visible and completed.

Inappropriate Language

While the effects of the recent decision by some scum spammer to use my domain name in their email addresses (there really should be a way to stop these people since they are clearly falsifying their identity) are starting to tail off, I have received a few more amusing bounce messages. Here’s my favourite so far, from the US Department of Energy:

Your message contained inappropriate language which is unacceptable at the U.S. Department of Energy. Please make the appropriate changes and resubmit your message.

Thank you.

09/14/06, 00:19:13
Re [2]:

Sadly, they didn’t include the original message, so I cannot tell what the inappropriate language was!

Spammers

I have encountered a couple of spam related issues this week. The first, shown in the image, was spam being added to message boards. The message itself was a long list of spam links, and then at the end of message it said this:

2admin,moderators: If you dont want to see us anymore click here

If you clicked on the link (or, perhaps wiser, copied the link and then pasted it into a new browser window so as not to leave the referrer information on their site pointing back at you), you found the page shown in the screen capture, which reads:

We are not looking for your traffic or attention,
We just want to obtain links to our sites from abandoned internet resources.

In order to add your domain to our global stop list, please write it here.
If you have more than 1 domain, add them separatly.

This is “unsubscribe” form, not the place for personal messages. Send them to those who
dont provide you with unsubscribe forms, you can easily reach anyone by domain whoises.

I doubt it works.

Then, this morning my mailbox was full of bounce messages. All addressed to email addresses that were a random string of letters @bluedonkey.org. I guess one of the spammers out there has latched on to my domain and will be using it to mask the sender address of their crap. You know, I don’t have a problem with advertising. I do have a problem with spammers though because they do two things which single them out as criminals rather than advertisers:

a) They use fake, and usually stolen addresses to send their crap out (strongly suggesting that they know what they are doing is something that they don’t want traced back to them).

b) They spend a long time trying to defeat the filters I put in place to stop their junk getting to me. If I go to the effort of adding a filter for their type of product, it is probably because I don’t want it. No amount of spam is going to change that. People who do want those services will presumably not install filters to block the ads.

The root cause though is that the companies making the products are willing to turn a blind eye to the techniques that their affiliates use to get ads into mailboxes. What should happen is that the companies making the products or providing the services should be fined each time their affiliates use fake addresses etc. That would pretty soon stop most of the crap arriving in my mailbox since it would cut off the revenue stream to the jerk sending the crap out.

If you received spam from a random looking address @bluedonkey.org, please understand that it did not come from me, nor from this site. Believe me, it has probably been much more annoying for me too since I have already received several hundred bounce messages, mailbox full messages and spam detected messages in response to this abuse of my domain name and it doesn’t look as though it is slowing down yet.

Free Landline and Mobile Calls

Gizmo Project, my preferred VoIP service which I’ve been using for over a year now for all my international calls and many others, has just started offering a new plan called All Calls Free. The plan makes calling many other Gizmo members free even if you call their home landline or, in some countries, their mobile number.

Calling any Gizmo member in Canada, China, Cyprus, Guam, Hong Kong, Malawi, Malaysia, Puerto Rico, Russia, Saipan, San Marino, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand, United States, US Vigin Islands or Vatican City is free on either their registered landline or mobile number as well as using their Gizmo name or number.

Calling members in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, French Antilles, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guadeloupe, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom, Venezuela or Zambia on their landline is free, but not on their mobile numbers.

Members just need to make sure that their landline and mobile numbers are stored in their profile and other Gizmo members will be able to call them for free.

Amusing, but sad

Take a look at the photo and see if you can tell what type of computer is being used there to create a cool photo book at Yophoto. It is clearly a Mac, although they have airbrushed out the Apple logo. Why would anybody do that?

Simple, the online user guide for the software that you must download and install before you can create one of these photo books says this:

Please note that unfortunately the software will not work on an Apple Macintosh.

So, the Mac was cool enough to use in their home page photo, but not actually cool enough for them to support with their software. And what is with the software anyway? Why is this not a web service that I upload my photos to, or something built on top of another photo site like Qoop? Shame because the books look like they’d have made nice gifts.

Network Neutrality


Save the Internet: Click here
I have heard a recording of Alaskan US Senator Ted Stevens talking about net neutrality a few times now. Each time I hear it I am puzzled initially by how somebody who has so much trouble speaking coherently got into an office where public speaking is so essential. But then I wonder whether it is just that he feels so passionately about this issue that his mind is racing ahead of his mouth (I’m sure we’ve all been there before).

Once you get past that issue though, you can easily separate out his arguments:

  1. The internet has a limited bandwidth. His analogy is tubes that can hold a certain amount of data at any one time. When the network is busy, emails and other information for consumers can be delayed by people pushing large files (he uses video as an example) over the internet. Senator Stevens says an email sent to him by his staff took a several days to be delivered because it was “tangled up” with other traffic.
  2. Commercial users of the internet, such as those delivering the video content over it, are not paying for the improvements in the network infrastructure, so why should they benefit from it. Shouldn’t they be made to build their own internet?

Continue reading

A Tale of AJAX and Four Browsers

Been playing with some of the AJAX web development libraries that have appeared to simplify the creation of AJAX enabled web sites. I have a few sites I am working for Devicescape where I’d like to use some AJAX, and a new site that I am working on that will be using it a lot.

I started doing all the work myself, but while looking for a web content management system for one of the new Devicescape sites I discovered script.aculo.us and I am impressed so far. I am starting on my own site, and have replaced all my manually generated requests with script.aculo.us calls as well as adding some new things like drag and drop and fade effects on transitions.

All sounds good, and indeed script.aculo.us does abstract many of the browser differences that I’d had to be cogniscent of when writing all the Javascript myself, but I still had issues getting it working on Internet Explorer (versions 6 and 7 still seem to have issues with CSS rendering), Safari (which was actually the hardest to solve) and Opera (which I’ve heard has very compliant CSS rendering).

Continue reading

Creative New Paypal Scam

I received a more creative Paypal scam email than the normal ones. Instead of ‘a new email has been added to your account’ or ‘your account has been suspended,’ this one was a Paypal receipt for a new Sony Camera that had been billed to my account. There was a link in the email for me to dispute the charge. That, of course, goes to a fake Paypal site that asked me to login.

I still see a number of these each week, along with the lottery scams from the Netherlands.

OfotoExpress Update

Following my last reply to Kodak Gallery’s customer support I received a reply that actually contained information (reproduced below). I am not sure whether it was posting the article on the blog or copying their PR department that prompted a response that was both more informative and much quicker than before.

The upshot is that the OfotoExpress tool was broken for people who have more than 100 albums by the recent site updates. Unfortunately, they don’t seem to know when they will have a fix for it. Read the response from Kevin C. after the jump.

Continue reading

Kodak EasyShare Gallery

Want to know how to wreck a pioneering web service in three easy steps? Kodak knows, and they’ve executed the plan perfectly with what was once the premier internet photo sharing and printing service, formerly known as Ofoto.

Back in 1999 Ofoto appeared as one of the first photo sharing and printing services. Snappy name, simple business model, and simple to use thanks to upload tools which avoided the problems of trying to upload multiple files through a web browser.

In June 2001, Kodak bought Ofoto. At first not much changed. A small icon appeared on the site denoting that it was a Kodak company, but nothing else changed. Then, in 2005, they started to destroy the service:

Continue reading